So much for only in America. Apparently some Genius called Chris Hill from Albury thinks the Government should shorten Daylight Saving to stop the drought – ah well it takes all kinds :)
Ok I don’t have the curl up tie but otherwise I have a lot in common with my favourite cartoon cubicle companion. See below
The world and Australians included are spinning out of debt control. To some extent I think we all have too much trust in others (like Banks or whatever) to look after our interests. We need to be in control of our own destiny.
I/we probably don’t use credit wisely or repay my loans quickly enough. But I know that if I only ever pay the minimum repayment on my credit card I will probably never repay the balance. As a method of payment Credit Cards are very convenient but as a vehicle for borrowing – which is what you do if you don’t repay in full – they suck.
SO credit card buyer beware – don’t let that minimum repayment number fool you :)
Minimum-payment requirements seem like a good idea: Without them, credit-card holders would pay too little and let balances bloom. But a new study indicates that many of us would pay more if our statements didn’t require a minimum.
The problem with minimum-payment requirements, the study found, is that they can lower a cardholder’s sense of what a reasonable payment is — an effect known as anchoring, which was especially strong among cardholders who usually paid more than the minimum but less than the total balance. A test group of such cardholders who got credit-card bills with $700 balances and no minimum-payment requirement paid an average of $280 — about 40 percent of the balance. A control group who received similar bills that included minimums, meanwhile, paid only $161, or 23 percent of the balance — a rate of payment that would have eventually cost them twice as much interest.
Minimum payments, then, are the cardholder’s enemy — and the creditor’s friend.
Post found on Very Short List
